June 7th, 2010
I was so excited to sit in on the weekly meeting of all the folks involved with making this exhibit a success. There were a lot of cool updates such as the search for a royal Rolls Royce (now say that five times fast!) for the show and upcoming AGO appearances at local summer festivals.
What I didn’t realize was that my role as the blogger was also on the agenda! After the initial chitchat about why it would be great for team members to write for the blog and possible topics that they could cover – did someone say Rolls Royce? – a more serious question came up.
How would staff deal with any potential fallout from the community blog? In other words, what about issues management?
Ah, the elephant in the room (yes, I know…I can’t help myself). History, let alone Indian history, is messy and potentially controversial. It’s a subject that makes even the good folks at Wikipedia wince.
In fact, a variation of the same question arose the next day at the community advisory board’s meeting. What might be some of the objections coming from within the South Asian communities to Maharaja: The Splendour of India’s Royal Courts?
I wasn’t surprised; I, too, was slightly apprehensive when I first heard about the exhibit, especially regarding its title. So here’s a few potential complaints:
An exhibit about royalty, what a cliché! Yup, but don’t we love our royals and celebrities? And yet, like the Europeans courts, the Maharajas were patrons of fine art. If you want to learn about the history of fine art and its changing role, you have to look at the courts and what happened to them.
Maharajas are Hindu, right? Although Maharajas are usually Hindu or Sikh, Maharaja is used because it is easily recognizable. In reality, the richest Indian royal was actually the Nizam of Hyderabad whose background was Muslim. Maharaja is merely a short hand for Indian royalty.
Is this only about India? No. The majority of the show’s objects date before the independence of Pakistan and India in 1947 when the area was generally known as India.
What about contemporary art? Local artists? Well, in 2007, the AGO’s Hungry God show displayed the work of contemporary Indian artists including Atul Dodiya, Bharti Kher and Subodh Gupta. For this exhibit, the team are hoping it will be possible to involve contemporary artists in some way, either through artworks or performances and events. It helps that two veterans of Toronto’s art scene are part of this process – Haema Sivanesan of the South Asian Visual Arts Centre (SAVAC) is Project Assistant for Maharaja and Camilla Singh, recently of the Museum of Contemporary Canadian Art (MOCCA), is part of the advisory committee.
It’s interesting how some of these issues seem to be about language, but really, it’s about information and the lack thereof. That’s why it helps to have this blog, eh?
- Read about the Nizam of Hyderabad and Berar’s silver jubilee celebrations in TIME magazine’s February 22, 1937 cover story.