<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Change is about experimentation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artmatters.ca/wp/2007/03/change-is-about-experimentation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artmatters.ca/wp/2007/03/change-is-about-experimentation/</link>
	<description>The Art Gallery of Ontario Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Talt</title>
		<link>http://artmatters.ca/wp/2007/03/change-is-about-experimentation/comment-page-1/#comment-1401</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Talt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artmatters.ca/wordpress/?p=124#comment-1401</guid>
		<description>The Opie additions appear as a shallow 2D parody of Moore&#039;s great accomplishments. Somehow the curator(s) convinced themselves they were clever and themselves creative. Their sad attempt deserves no further comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Opie additions appear as a shallow 2D parody of Moore&#8217;s great accomplishments. Somehow the curator(s) convinced themselves they were clever and themselves creative. Their sad attempt deserves no further comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Talt</title>
		<link>http://artmatters.ca/wp/2007/03/change-is-about-experimentation/comment-page-1/#comment-3952</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Talt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artmatters.ca/wordpress/?p=124#comment-3952</guid>
		<description>The Opie additions appear as a shallow 2D parody of Moore&#039;s great accomplishments. Somehow the curator(s) convinced themselves they were clever and themselves creative. Their sad attempt deserves no further comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Opie additions appear as a shallow 2D parody of Moore&#8217;s great accomplishments. Somehow the curator(s) convinced themselves they were clever and themselves creative. Their sad attempt deserves no further comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Allen</title>
		<link>http://artmatters.ca/wp/2007/03/change-is-about-experimentation/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artmatters.ca/wordpress/?p=124#comment-167</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more with Ernest Somers.  Rather than push the boundaries, Julian Opie&#039;s figures loom large as pedestrian examples of graphic forms from the 70s.  Rather than shocking, they appear simply tawdry and unfortunately interfere with the viewer&#039;s experience of the Moore sculpture.  For shame....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with Ernest Somers.  Rather than push the boundaries, Julian Opie&#8217;s figures loom large as pedestrian examples of graphic forms from the 70s.  Rather than shocking, they appear simply tawdry and unfortunately interfere with the viewer&#8217;s experience of the Moore sculpture.  For shame&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Allen</title>
		<link>http://artmatters.ca/wp/2007/03/change-is-about-experimentation/comment-page-1/#comment-3951</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artmatters.ca/wordpress/?p=124#comment-3951</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more with Ernest Somers.  Rather than push the boundaries, Julian Opie&#039;s figures loom large as pedestrian examples of graphic forms from the 70s.  Rather than shocking, they appear simply tawdry and unfortunately interfere with the viewer&#039;s experience of the Moore sculpture.  For shame....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with Ernest Somers.  Rather than push the boundaries, Julian Opie&#8217;s figures loom large as pedestrian examples of graphic forms from the 70s.  Rather than shocking, they appear simply tawdry and unfortunately interfere with the viewer&#8217;s experience of the Moore sculpture.  For shame&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Galea</title>
		<link>http://artmatters.ca/wp/2007/03/change-is-about-experimentation/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Galea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 13:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artmatters.ca/wordpress/?p=124#comment-164</guid>
		<description>This is the sad thing about the art world today...anything can be rationalized into art provided the artist is educated. It seems that this is testimony proving that art is no longer about talent or insight and has completed it transformation into blatent self-promotion through shock value. Truly TRANSFORMATION AGO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the sad thing about the art world today&#8230;anything can be rationalized into art provided the artist is educated. It seems that this is testimony proving that art is no longer about talent or insight and has completed it transformation into blatent self-promotion through shock value. Truly TRANSFORMATION AGO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Galea</title>
		<link>http://artmatters.ca/wp/2007/03/change-is-about-experimentation/comment-page-1/#comment-3950</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Galea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artmatters.ca/wordpress/?p=124#comment-3950</guid>
		<description>This is the sad thing about the art world today...anything can be rationalized into art provided the artist is educated. It seems that this is testimony proving that art is no longer about talent or insight and has completed it transformation into blatent self-promotion through shock value. Truly TRANSFORMATION AGO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the sad thing about the art world today&#8230;anything can be rationalized into art provided the artist is educated. It seems that this is testimony proving that art is no longer about talent or insight and has completed it transformation into blatent self-promotion through shock value. Truly TRANSFORMATION AGO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Gold</title>
		<link>http://artmatters.ca/wp/2007/03/change-is-about-experimentation/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 01:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artmatters.ca/wordpress/?p=124#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I just discovered your gallery as I&#039;ve been doing some Internet research on Henry Moore who is my favorite sculptor. Indeed, I made a blog post about him only yesterday. Here is the link:
http://lougold.blogspot.com/2007/05/henry-moore-re-visionary-artist-ive.html

Best regards, 

Lou Gold</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I just discovered your gallery as I&#8217;ve been doing some Internet research on Henry Moore who is my favorite sculptor. Indeed, I made a blog post about him only yesterday. Here is the link:<br />
<a href="http://lougold.blogspot.com/2007/05/henry-moore-re-visionary-artist-ive.html" rel="nofollow">http://lougold.blogspot.com/2007/05/henry-moore-re-visionary-artist-ive.html</a></p>
<p>Best regards, </p>
<p>Lou Gold</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Gold</title>
		<link>http://artmatters.ca/wp/2007/03/change-is-about-experimentation/comment-page-1/#comment-3949</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 01:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artmatters.ca/wordpress/?p=124#comment-3949</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I just discovered your gallery as I&#039;ve been doing some Internet research on Henry Moore who is my favorite sculptor. Indeed, I made a blog post about him only yesterday. Here is the link:
http://lougold.blogspot.com/2007/05/henry-moore-re-visionary-artist-ive.html

Best regards, 

Lou Gold</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I just discovered your gallery as I&#8217;ve been doing some Internet research on Henry Moore who is my favorite sculptor. Indeed, I made a blog post about him only yesterday. Here is the link:<br />
<a href="http://lougold.blogspot.com/2007/05/henry-moore-re-visionary-artist-ive.html" rel="nofollow">http://lougold.blogspot.com/2007/05/henry-moore-re-visionary-artist-ive.html</a></p>
<p>Best regards, </p>
<p>Lou Gold</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Rubenzahl</title>
		<link>http://artmatters.ca/wp/2007/03/change-is-about-experimentation/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Rubenzahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artmatters.ca/wordpress/?p=124#comment-161</guid>
		<description>This juxtaposition of Henry Moore and Julian Opie certainly seems to inspire a new and perhaps critical look at both artists. 

Check out Kelvin Browne&#039;s article in the National Post from last August titled &quot;Drawings tease Moore sculptures&quot;. Kelvin says that &quot;I&#039;ve been looking at the Henry Moore sculptures at the Art Gallery of Ontario for years, but now know I haven&#039;t been seeing them for a long time. This revelation came when British artist Julian Opie&#039;s pole dancers, a.k.a. strippers, arrived in the Moore gallery and compelled me to open my eyes.

The drawings are not to everyone&#039;s taste. This is a good thing. They incite the usual polite outrage that provocative art exhibitions muster and prove a basic observation many have about Toronto: We&#039;re a bit complacent. If we choose between great art that makes you question its validity and pretty pictures, pretty wins. Similarly, a good conventional building is preferred to the exotic and unique. Our taste in most things embraces the underwhelming.&quot;

From Drawings tease Moore sculptures/National Post August 24, 2006 - http://tinyurl.com/27zylr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This juxtaposition of Henry Moore and Julian Opie certainly seems to inspire a new and perhaps critical look at both artists. </p>
<p>Check out Kelvin Browne&#8217;s article in the National Post from last August titled &#8220;Drawings tease Moore sculptures&#8221;. Kelvin says that &#8220;I&#8217;ve been looking at the Henry Moore sculptures at the Art Gallery of Ontario for years, but now know I haven&#8217;t been seeing them for a long time. This revelation came when British artist Julian Opie&#8217;s pole dancers, a.k.a. strippers, arrived in the Moore gallery and compelled me to open my eyes.</p>
<p>The drawings are not to everyone&#8217;s taste. This is a good thing. They incite the usual polite outrage that provocative art exhibitions muster and prove a basic observation many have about Toronto: We&#8217;re a bit complacent. If we choose between great art that makes you question its validity and pretty pictures, pretty wins. Similarly, a good conventional building is preferred to the exotic and unique. Our taste in most things embraces the underwhelming.&#8221;</p>
<p>From Drawings tease Moore sculptures/National Post August 24, 2006 &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/27zylr" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/27zylr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Rubenzahl</title>
		<link>http://artmatters.ca/wp/2007/03/change-is-about-experimentation/comment-page-1/#comment-3948</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Rubenzahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artmatters.ca/wordpress/?p=124#comment-3948</guid>
		<description>This juxtaposition of Henry Moore and Julian Opie certainly seems to inspire a new and perhaps critical look at both artists. 

Check out Kelvin Browne&#039;s article in the National Post from last August titled &quot;Drawings tease Moore sculptures&quot;. Kelvin says that &quot;I&#039;ve been looking at the Henry Moore sculptures at the Art Gallery of Ontario for years, but now know I haven&#039;t been seeing them for a long time. This revelation came when British artist Julian Opie&#039;s pole dancers, a.k.a. strippers, arrived in the Moore gallery and compelled me to open my eyes.

The drawings are not to everyone&#039;s taste. This is a good thing. They incite the usual polite outrage that provocative art exhibitions muster and prove a basic observation many have about Toronto: We&#039;re a bit complacent. If we choose between great art that makes you question its validity and pretty pictures, pretty wins. Similarly, a good conventional building is preferred to the exotic and unique. Our taste in most things embraces the underwhelming.&quot;

From Drawings tease Moore sculptures/National Post August 24, 2006 - http://tinyurl.com/27zylr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This juxtaposition of Henry Moore and Julian Opie certainly seems to inspire a new and perhaps critical look at both artists. </p>
<p>Check out Kelvin Browne&#8217;s article in the National Post from last August titled &#8220;Drawings tease Moore sculptures&#8221;. Kelvin says that &#8220;I&#8217;ve been looking at the Henry Moore sculptures at the Art Gallery of Ontario for years, but now know I haven&#8217;t been seeing them for a long time. This revelation came when British artist Julian Opie&#8217;s pole dancers, a.k.a. strippers, arrived in the Moore gallery and compelled me to open my eyes.</p>
<p>The drawings are not to everyone&#8217;s taste. This is a good thing. They incite the usual polite outrage that provocative art exhibitions muster and prove a basic observation many have about Toronto: We&#8217;re a bit complacent. If we choose between great art that makes you question its validity and pretty pictures, pretty wins. Similarly, a good conventional building is preferred to the exotic and unique. Our taste in most things embraces the underwhelming.&#8221;</p>
<p>From Drawings tease Moore sculptures/National Post August 24, 2006 &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/27zylr" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/27zylr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

